<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Si Dawson - Latest Comments in How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.disqus.com/</link><description>Experiments in Self Improvement</description><atom:link href="https://sidawson.disqus.com/si_dawson_how_to_be_confident/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:37:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-16034665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another thing to consider is that it is possible to get all the precision you desire without using any of the words above. Scientists do this all the time. Plus mentally it'll put you in a significantly better space.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Si Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-16033705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking about this. It boils down to something along the lines of, I'm being more precisely imprecise - if that makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rather than saying "it will happen" or "it will not happen", I'm giving what I consider to be an accurate prediction of what I expect to happen. Either it will happen or it won't, but at the time I speak, I'm speaking in statistically probable values; there's a 75% chance it will happen, or there's a 95% chance it won't happen (obviously, these are not both the same chance; unless the former is "if person a does x" and the latter "if person a fails to do x in a timely manner") - either way, it's specific.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I need to be aware of the fact that other people aren't thinking statistically, and adjust my usage appropriately; either specify that, or, likely (hah!) more usefully, change my verb choice to something more confident...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llearch n'n'daCorna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15668564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't it, though?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llearch n'n'daCorna</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:20:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15612394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting point that you deliberately use imprecise language in order to be more accurate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Si Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15611628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an interesting list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I use an awful lot of those sorts of phrases, because, well, they describe precisely what I mean. "probably going to be that way" because, on balance of likelyhoods, it probably will be that way. "I'll figure it out" because I will. I honestly expect to figure it out, without any problems at all. "I guess", "I need to", because I do guess, and I do need to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is, I suspect (ooo, another one) one of the differences in the way I think to the way everyone else thinks. Or something similar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll think on it. There is a solution there somewhere...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llearch n'n'daCorna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15449459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yawning is a great sign. Means that your energy is clearing. All good stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Si Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15447625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for these great ideas! I've tapped on 'I dunno' so far, and did a lot of yawning. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lolamy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15382033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*smile* well, you're the one who inspired me down this path in the first place.. what goes around comes around.. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Si Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Be Confident</title><link>http://sidawson.org/2009/08/how-to-be-confident.html#comment-15357486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Si, you are SO inspiring!!  Thanks for this!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeannette</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:08:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>